Carbon Dating Does Not Disprove the Bible
Evolutionists have long used the carbon, or radiocarbon, dating technique as a “hammer” to bludgeon Bible-believing Christians. A straightforward reading of. Any scientist with an open mind would tell you that if these assumptions were shifted towards a Biblical view, the carbon dating process would. What is a Christian to make of radioactive dating? anyone says that the Bible does not mean what it says we need to think long and hard.
The second assumption is that the level of 14C in the environment is mostly constant. It was believed for two centuries that it was an absolute constant, but scientists have recently discovered that it fluctuates based upon several different factors.
This is the biggest assumption that is challenged by many scientists today because 14C is produced when cosmic rays hit the upper atmosphere and change Nitrogen into 14C. Since the amount of cosmic rays hitting these Nitrogen atoms is affected by the magnetic field of the earth and that field has been in a diminishing state since it was first observed in the midth century, many scientists have a hard time assuming that the levels of 14C in the atmosphere is anywhere near constant enough to use in measurements.
Today it is about 10 percent weaker than it was when German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss started keeping tabs on it inscientists say. If one were to adjust their assumptions and apply the Biblical telling of Creation, Carbon Dating still fits. The reason that it fits is based upon the Flood of Noah.
Radiocarbon Dating and American Evangelical Christians
Biblical Assumptions The magnetic field is decaying. The world itself has been dramatically changed on two occasions according to the Bible — during the Great Flood and in the resulting shifts that occurred. The Genesis Flood tells of a planet that was much more rich in life than it is today.
One particularly interesting theory shows that the majority of the world has a single large land mass. When a huge shelf of water 10 miles beneath the earth was released, the very shape of the earth was changed. Plates moved across the planet, forming the continents and oceans as we see them today.
Carbon Dating and the Bible
It creates amazing scientific explanations for things such as the Grand Canyon, portions of the fossil record, and the tectonic plates. It also partially explains the various ages associated with fossils of creatures from before the flood. As the shelf of water spewed forth into the land and the land masses themselves collapsed into the void, the earth may have in essence, shrunk.
This would have had the same effect as a spinning ice skater pulling in her limbs to accelerate her rotation. The days were measured at per year prior to the flood and eventually the calendars were shifted to the current day model. Did this happen because the earth had started spinning more rapidly, causing more days to occur during a single revolution around the sun?
If one believes the story of Noah and applies that assumption to current scientific models, they do not conflict. That lack of conflict includes Carbon Dating. In many ways, Carbon Dating is another example of science demonstrating the literal truths found in the Bible.
Carbon-14 Dating Does Not Disprove the Bible
God confounded the speech of the people in that city so that they could not understand each other's language. They then left Babel and radiated in all directions, forming new civilizations around the world.
New-Earth creationism is mainly promoted by people who believe that the Bible authors were inspired by God to write text that is inerrant -- free of error. Rejection of the C dating method: New-earth creationists obviously cannot accept the accuracy of the C dating method.
They were unable to date the object directly since it is made from oolitic limestone. However, they were able to date many personal objects found with the object in the same archaeological layer of the Willendorf deposit. Creation scientists cannot accept these dates as accurate since they believe that the world was created sometime between and BCE. Since the accuracy of the Bible cannot be questioned, C dating must contain massive errors -- by as much as a factor of five.
Similarly, other radiometric measurements which do not use carbon, have dated rocks in northern Quebec, Canada, at almost four billion years old.
Carbon Dating and the Bible | Let's Reason Together
Reasons for rejection of C dating, with rebuttals: It is our policy to accurately portray both or all sides to each belief whenever multiple viewpoints exist. If you feel that we are not fairly describing one side, please use the "Contact Us" button at the bottom of this page to send us a complaint.
Please be sure to include the name of this file c14datc. Some direct criticisms of the C dating technique are: A team of researchers, headed by Willard F. Libby calibrated the C measuring technique by comparing the measured age of samples from ancient Egypt with their known date. For example, they tested a piece of wood from Pharaoh Zoser's tomb with the known tomb date, which was known to be circa to BCE.